NIS2 compliance and maritime cyber resilience, without the legalese
Most compliance products are a spreadsheet that asks you to swear you did the work. This is the work itself, the controls, with the paperwork falling out of it as a by-product.
What NIS2 actually expects
NIS2 is the European Union's updated cybersecurity law. It widened the net dramatically: many more organisations now count as essential or important entities, and with that status comes a duty to manage cyber risk properly, not as a project you finish, but as something you do continuously and can evidence.
Crucially, it makes management personally accountable. Leadership has to understand the risks, approve the measures, oversee them, and be trained. "We assumed IT had it covered" stopped being a defence.
In practice the directive asks for a handful of sensible things, done consistently: understand your risks, secure your networks and devices, control who has access, keep working copies of your data, watch for trouble, manage your suppliers, train your people, and, when something significant happens, investigate and report it quickly. There are hard deadlines: an early warning within 24 hours, a fuller notification within 72 hours, and a final report within a month.
None of that is unreasonable. The hard part is doing it across every server, laptop and network link you own, consistently, with enough record-keeping to prove it months later when somebody asks. That gap is what this platform is built to close.
For the details, article by article (who is in scope, the ten measures, the reporting stages and the fines), read NIS2 requirements, explained.
And if you operate ships
IMO cyber resilience: IACS UR E26 & E27
E26 covers the cyber resilience of the ship: identification, protection, detection, response and recovery across the vessel's systems. E27 covers the on-board systems and equipment themselves, and what suppliers must deliver with them. Both apply to vessels contracted for construction on or after 1 July 2024, and are verified at Classification-Society survey.
Most of what NIS2 asks for is common to both. E26/E27 add operational-technology and safety-of-life controls (deterministic safe-state behaviour, independent local control, security zones and conduits) while NIS2 keeps its own reporting deadlines and its management-body liability. Run the maritime profile and the platform produces both analyses side by side: one programme, two reports.
More for maritime operatorsWhy evidence is the hard part
Ask any organisation whether it controls access, and the answer is yes. Ask it to show, for a date eight months ago, who had administrative rights, when the last leaver's account was closed and who approved the exception, and the answer becomes an afternoon of archaeology.
Here, each protective capability does its job and leaves a trail. When the gateway blocks a hostile connection, when a machine reports a missing update, when an account is switched off the moment somebody leaves, when a supplier's remote session ends: all of it is recorded automatically, dated, and exportable. The evidence an auditor wants becomes a by-product of staying secure rather than a separate annual ordeal.
And because everything reports into one place, you are never guessing: one honest view of where you stand, what is healthy, and what still needs attention, ranked so you fix what matters first.
Obligation by obligation
What the rules ask for, and which capability delivers it. Open any capability for the full story.
- Risk analysis & security policies
- A live view of the estate and the threats against it, with the policy register kept alongside it (Bridge and Lookout).
- Incident handling & reporting
- Investigate what happened and meet the 24h / 72h / one-month clock, with the notifications drafted (Logbook).
- Business continuity, backup & crisis management
- Tamper-resistant copies kept apart from live systems, with rehearsed recovery plans (Safe Harbor, with exercises under Muster).
- Supply-chain security
- A maintained supplier register with criticality, security requirements and third-party access (Chandler).
- Network & system security
- Protection at the boundary and on every device, with zones that keep systems apart (Seawall and Deckhand).
- Availability & resilient connectivity
- Multiple links with automatic failover and traffic priority, so a security control never becomes the outage (Fairway).
- Vulnerability handling & disclosure
- Known weaknesses found and ranked by what attackers actually exploit (Radar).
- Assessing effectiveness of measures
- Continuous evidence that controls are on and working, plus scheduled review (Bridge).
- Cyber hygiene & training
- Role-based training, phishing simulation and crisis exercises, recorded per person (Muster).
- Cryptography & encryption
- The register of where encryption is used and how it is configured, kept with the rest of the evidence (Bridge).
- Human resources, asset management & access control
- Know every device and every piece of software (Quartermaster), and control who may do what (Helm).
- Secure remote & emergency access
- Recorded, time-bound sessions instead of standing accounts and open ports (Gangway).
From first install to audit-ready
A path you can walk in stages: protection from day one, evidence that builds itself.
Guard the edge
Put protection on the boundary so hostile traffic is stopped before it lands, and divide the network into zones that make sense.
Roll out the agent
A light agent on servers and laptops: inventory, health and weaknesses, automatically and continuously.
Tidy access and suppliers
Least privilege, strong sign-in, clean offboarding, and a supplier register that reflects who can actually reach you.
Watch your posture
See live readiness against the framework, close what it highlights, and export the evidence on demand.
What we will not tell you
No platform makes you compliant on its own, and any vendor claiming otherwise is describing a product that does not exist. Compliance is a set of things an organisation does; software can carry most of the weight, evidence almost all of it, and remove nearly all of the drudgery, but somebody still has to decide, approve and sign.
We are also not a law firm. Whether you are in scope, and as which kind of entity, depends on your sector, size and national implementation. We will tell you what we see and what similar organisations concluded, and where you need a legal opinion, we will say so.
What we will do is make sure the underlying work is genuinely done and genuinely evidenced. Under Complete we take that on as a service, with a service level and our own signature next to yours.
Find out where you actually stand
Tell us your sector, size and what you run. We will map your obligations to what is already in place and what is missing, and give you the gap list whether or not you buy anything.